.jpg)
Posts
By: B. Brown - BREG
Why is it that a lot of people truly don't want to see other people make it? Why do people always ask why are you doing this job when I just saw you in a movie, on tv and/or I have your cd?
There are a lot of talented people in the world and the truth is, some of us will became rich and famous; and some of us will not. That's the way it goes. If every single one of us could become rich and famous, how would our world work then? There has to be different people doing different things to make the world work.There seems to be an issue with Stacy Francis, one of the finalist on "X Factor." There are people in the world that believe that she should not be able to compete because she has been signed to a major label before and has done some impressive industry work in the past. But here's the real situation as far as I am concerned, she has never achieved huge success to allow her to receive the riches and fame of becoming a successful recording artist. I'm all for her getting another shot at hitting it big in the music industry. I believe she is an undeniable talent even at the age of 42.
Most people, including a lot of artists believe they are supposed to be rich and famous because they are talented. Sorry, that's not reality. It's takes a lot of hard work, connections and resources (i.e. money) to usually make it in any business, but especially in the music/entertainment business because very seldomly can an artist or band do it all by themselves. So even when an artist is Blessed, some may say cursed to receive a major record deal, it definitely doesn't mean you are going to become rich and famous. We have too many examples of artists that got there shots and that's it, it didn't work.
Now, I'm a believer in second chances and possibly third chances depending on the situation. I'm a baseball man, so it's usually three-strikes and you're out with me. When you look at these super-duper talent contests like AMERICAN IDOL, THE VOICE and X FACTOR; we are looking at multi-million dollar productions that need real talent to rise to the top and a lot of artists that have had major deals in the past are always looking for second and third chances, so of course they enter these contests and a lot of them make it to the finals. Do some research and you'll see that a lot of your favorite competitors have made headway in the industry prior to getting their shine on your favorite "reality" singing-contest-tv show. It's a fact.
I'm happy for any artist that gets a shot at accomplishing their goals because the overwhelming majority of artists, musicians, producers, managers, etc. never get a shot at the major level of the music industry and I take my hat off to the ones that have seen a glimpse, been disappointed and have kept working to make their dreams come true.
Checkout the the article below about Stacy Francis - "X Factor" and what do you believe should happen?
One Love!
Why All the Hate for Stacy Francis?
Posted Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:05pm PDT by Lyndsey Parker
Over the course of the past week, "X Factor" hopeful Stacy Francis, the 42-year-old single mom with a dream and a pair of easily activated tearducts, practically went from being America's sweetheart to America's most hated, when her professional past was "outed" by anti-fan site Vote For The Worst, and later by Radar Online and Perez Hilton. (The latter blogger called her a "fraud" and seemed to harbor a personal vendetta against her, after a Twitter feud between them escalated when Adam Lambert jumped to Stacy's defense.) Of course, none of these gossippy sites actually exposed anything than couldn't be uncovered via a regular query on YouTube, Wikipedia, or IMDB. But the inflammatory articles still elicited public outrage that could now possibly thwart the former frontrunner's chances, as the "X Factor" live voting begins this week.
Yes, Stacy was a member of the '90s R&B girl group Ex-Girlfriend, who were signed to Reprise by Mariah Carey manager Benny Medina and produced by R. Kelly. Yes, she has performed with Whitney Houston, Madonna, and Prince. Yes, she has starred in Broadway and West End musicals. And yes, in 2004 she was hired to perform at Tom Cruise's birthday party. But how, exactly, does this differentiate her from her seasoned "X Factor" castmate LeRoy Bell, who used to write songs for the Spinners, the O'Jays, the Temptations, and Elton John, some of which made the Billboard charts; who was once nominated for a Grammy; and who's performed with the likes of B.B. King, Van Morrison, Sheryl Crow, Etta James, Al Green, Erykah Badu, LeAnn Rimes, and Idina Menzel? How does this make Stacy different from her open admirer Adam Lambert, who starred in The Ten Commandments with Val Kilmer before "American Idol," or from "The Voice's" winner Javier Colon and runner-up Dia Frampton, both of whom had previous major-label deals?
The issue, of course, is transparency--for which "The X Factor's" producers and editors are likely more to blame than Stacy herself. Come on, there is NO reason to assume that "The X Factor" powers-that-be were entirely unaware of Stacy's past professional endeavors; even if she had failed to mention her credentials, or even intentionally lied about them, any cursory background check would have quickly brought up all those YouTube videos, Last.fm and MySpace bio pages, BroadwayWorld.com articles, etc. But of course, splicing together the juicier, more emotional tidbits from Stacy's "X Factor" interviews--to paint her out to be a struggling mother, domestic abuse victim, and keeper of deferred dreams--made for better television than depicting her as just another Melinda Doolittle type, just another industry pro hoping to take her career to the next level after years of steady C-list work.
It's no wonder that viewers feel duped, but really, this is not unlike how the producers of "The Voice" initially chose to focus on Javier's family-man background and Dia's side career as an author of children's books, while overlooking those contestants' respective tenures with Capitol and Warner Bros. Records. Or how "American Idol" depicted Season 7's Carly Smithson as an Irish immigrant with visa issues and Kristy Lee Cook as a farmgirl who sold her horse to raise the funds to travel to her audition, while conveniently failing to mention that both girls had past ties to "Idol"-affiliated record labels.
Most of the reality contestants mentioned above emerged from their "scandals" relatively unscathed--in the case of "The Voice" specifically, that was probably because that show never overtly claimed that its contestants were total unknowns who'd queued up for hours in rainy parking lots to attend open auditions. But Carly, whose situation was the closest to what Stacy is going through now, definitely suffered from what appeared to be deliberate deception, or at least an egregious sin of factual omission. As a teenager under the name Carly Hennessy, she had been signed to MCA Records when Randy Jackson actually still worked there; when this came out mid-season, disgruntled "Idol" viewers actually rallied for her disqualification, and Carly eventually stalled in sixth place despite being an early favorite. I will freely admit that at the time, I wrote quite angrily about what seemed to be a great reality-TV injustice. But looking back, I now sheepishly wonder: Was this backlash Carly's fault? Did she deliberately portray herself as a newbie when she was anything but, or was that "Idol's" doing? And if Carly had been honestly portrayed as a showbiz second-chancer who'd fallen on tough times and needed a career reboot, would she have fared better on the show? These are the same kinds of questions being asked about Stacy Francis and "The X Factor" now.
The bottom line is, it's a bit of a stretch to say that Stacy is someone who has "already made it." While she has definitely made industry inroads and had some career breaks that many aspiring singers only dream about, I had never heard of her before she auditioned for "The X Factor," and neither had probably 99.9 percent of the American TV-viewing public. And I have no reason to believe she wasn't still struggling or living in a modest one-bedroom apartment, as she has claimed; as a longtime L.A. resident, I can assure you that this industry town is filled with many Hollywood bit players who, despite walk-on sitcom roles or famous friends or impressively lengthy CVs, still hold day jobs or have trouble paying their bills. Really, Stacy is just another under-the-radar talent who has come close, but not quite close enough, to her superstardom goal. As she put it in a backstage interview I conducted with her last week: "If I was Janet Jackson, I wouldn't be here. There's a reason why I'm here."
So, what do you think? Was Stacy deceptive about her past, or are producers and selective editors to blame here? Should shows like "The X Factor" be more transparent about contestants' backgrounds in general, to avoid such backlashes, or--here's a thought--do you think these series' producers secretly (or maybe not-so-secretly) relish the free publicity that such scandals generate?
I personally think Stacy should be given the same chance, and the same benefit of the doubt, as any less-experienced "X Factor" contestant, and let her talent do the talking (or the singing, as it were). If there's a real reason why all those years of slogging away in the Hollywood trenches never got her very far, that'll soon become all too clear on future "X Factor" episodes. But until then, let's all back off.
No comments:
Post a Comment